Ethical behavior principle Essay Example for Free

Ethical behavior principle Essay The behavior of each and every person is control by moral and the guiding principles. This is normally portrayed in our daily usual acts, and hence shaping of our ethical behavior is critical in the making sound decision and upholds the trust of the public. A successful business is only possible if there is a strong and profound held value. Most companies will set up strategy of coming up with the required values in order to attract their prospective clients, manage their workers, and attained the expected development of the company. The guiding principles of ethical behaviors which these companies will struggle to uphold are based on the values. According to American Psychological Association, (1953) these values include beneficence and nonmaleficence, fidelity and responsibility, integrity, justice, respects for people’s rights, and dignity. Coordination and active participation of the workers will be of great importance in attracting the attention of the clients. In any organization, leaders will continually strive to ensure that their company achieved its standard. Their main aim is to make sure that the rights of the employees are taken care of, and that the company in general performs well at all cost. In order to achieve this, their actions will be guided by the ethical values which will assist them in the decision making processes (Leal, 1998).

Libertarianism Essays -- essays research papers

For centuries philosophers have debated over the presence of free will. As a result of these often-heated arguments, many factions have evolved, the two most prominent being the schools of Libertarianism and of Determinism. Within these two schools of thought lies another debate, that of compatibilism, or whether or not the two believes can co-exist. In his essay, Has the Self â€Å"Free Will†?, C.A. Campbell, a staunch non-compatiblist and libertarian, attempts to explain the Libertarian argument.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  To achieve this, Campbell first sets out the two pre-suppositions necessary to the Libertarian argument. Firstly, he defines which kind of freedom he is discussing when he speaks of free will. Campbell characterizes â€Å"the freedom at issue† as one that predominantly concerns a person’s inner acts and decisions (377). A person’s observable acts are important only as they show an inner â€Å"life of choice†(377). Therefore the moral freedom assumed is that freedom which concerns inner acts. The second, and more complicated, of Campbell’s requirements is to define what constitutes a â€Å"free act.† There are two parts to this definition. The first necessitates â€Å"that the act must be one of which the person judged can be regarded as the sole author† (378). This point raises the question of how one can determine authorship. For certainly â€Å"the raw material of impulses and capacities that constitute [one’s] hereditary endowment† cannot be determined by the individual and surely have an impact on his inner acts (378). Further, the individual cannot control â€Å"the material and social environment in which he is destined to live† and these factors must influence his inner acts as well (378). Campbell allows that, while these aspects do have an impact on one’s inner acts, people in general â€Å"make allowances† for them, and still feel morally responsible for one’s self (378). In other words, one recogni zes the effects of hereditary and environment on his inner acts, but acknowledges that his self can and should still be held morally responsible, as it can overcome these factors. Thus, Campbell claims, sole authorship of an act is possible. The second part of this definition of a â€Å"free act† requires that one could have acted otherwise because one could have chosen otherwise (380). With this final presupposition, Campbell states that an act is a free act if and only if... ...† in that it is a â€Å"creative act of moral decision† and is only significant from the inner standpoint (387/389)). With these criticisms dispelled, Campbell can finally claim Libertarianism as the leading philosophical viewpoint. With Campbell’s argument entirely laid out, the final question remains: is it sound? Based on the premises of his arguments as I see them, I believe I am safe in saying that yes, his argument is sound. Campbell has explained his premises clearly enough to persuade me into his manner of thinking. The only threat to his argument that I see lies in the his rebuttal of the meaninglessness criticism. I feel that he did not respond to this critique head on. Campbell claims that only the person making the moral choice can be aware of the reasons he made that choice. He, also, claimed that even a Determinist placed in a position of moral choice, has to be aware of his freedom of decision, but, if that is true, how do the advocates of meaninglessness fail to see the reason behind the choices they have made? This is the only point I am aware of that can jeopardize the soundness of Campbell’s argument. If he can explain this, he will have made a libertarian out of me.

Acct Stuff Essay

CASE 5 – Evidence 1. For each of the following specific audit procedures, indicate the type of audit procedure it represents: (1) inspection of records or documents, (2) inspection of tangible assets, (3) observation, (4) inquiry, (5) confirmation, (6) recalculation, (7) reperformance, (8) analytical procedures, and (9) scanning. a. Sending a written request to the client’s customers requesting that they report the amount owed to the client. a. Confirmation i. Existence; trying to determine if A/R is overstated. b. Examining large sales invoices for a period of two days before and after year-end to determine if sales are recorded in the proper period. b. Inspection of document/records ii. Cutoff; make sure sales are recorded in proper period. c. Agreeing the total of the accounts receivable subsidiary ledger to the accounts receivable general ledger account. c. Reperformance-does total agree? iii. completeness d. Discussing the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts with the credit manager. d. Inquiry iv. Valuation and allocation e. Comparing the current-year gross profit percentage with the gross profit percentage for the last four years. e. Analytical procedures v. Valuation and allocation f. Examining a new plastic extrusion machine to ensure that this major acquisition was received. f. Inspection of tangible assets vi. existence g. Watching the client’s warehouse personnel count the raw materials inventory. g. Observation vii. Existence/completeness h. Performing test counts of the warehouse personnel’s count of the raw material. h. Reperformance viii. Valuation and allocation i. Obtaining a letter from the client’s attorney indicating that there were no lawsuits in progress against the client. i. Confirmation ix. Existence/valuation and allocation j. Tracing the prices used by the client’s billing program for pricing sales invoices to the client’s approved price list. j. Inspection of documents x. accuracy k. Reviewing the general ledger for unusual adjusting entries. k. Scanning xi. Valuation and allocation. 2. For each of the audit procedures listed in 1 above, identify the primary assertion being tested.

Examen Médico y Requisitos para la Residencia

Como parte del proceso para obtener la residencia hay que someterse a un examen mà ©dico que certifica que la persona no tiene enfermedades contagiosas ni va a convertirse en una carga para el estado si es que tiene alguna condicià ³n preexistente. El examen mà ©dico tiene lugar casi al final del tramite de los papeles, se està © dentro o fuera de los Estados Unidos, cuando las autoridades migratorias o consulares lo indican. A este hay que presentarse con certificados de vacunas y si es el caso, vacunarse de nuevo contra las enfermedades que haga falta. El examen lo realiza un mà ©dico autorizado por el gobierno. En Estados Unidos es muy fà ¡cil encontrar a los doctores que pueden realizar dicho examen, en linea (aqui) o llamando al Centro Nacional de Servicio al Cliente de la USCIS (1-800-375-5283). En el exterior tambià ©n es posible buscar un mà ©dico autorizado por la embajada o consulado. Una vez en la cita, el mà ©dico revisarà ¡ la documentacià ³n que se le presente y las cartillas de vacunacià ³n. Se realizarà ¡ un examen fà ­sico de ojos, oà ­do, nariz, garganta, abdomen, pulmones, nà ³dulos linfà ¡ticos, corazà ³n, piel, genitales, presià ³n arterial, peso y estatura, entre otros. Ademà ¡s, habrà ¡ extraccià ³n de sangre y un examen de rayos X. Los menores de 15 aà ±os podrà ­an no hacerse la radiografà ­a ni los exà ¡menes de sangre; las embarazadas podrà ­an posponerla hasta despuà ©s de haber dado a luz. Dentro de Estados Unidos, los resultados se entregan al solicitante en sobre cerrado que pasa a manos del oficial de inmigracià ³n el dà ­a de la entrevista. Si se està ¡ en otro paà ­s, el procedimiento a seguir depende del mà ©dico y/o del consulado.  ¿Quà © documentos hay que llevar a la cita mà ©dica? A esta cita hay que presentarse con: Cartilla de vacunas (paperas, rubeola, sarampià ³n, polio, tà ©tano, difteria, rotavirus, gripa o influenza, influenza tipo B, tos ferina (pertussis), varicela, neumococo, meningococo, hepatitis A y B). El especialista puede pedir vacunas adicionales contra cualquier enfermedad que el Comità © de de Prà ¡cticas de Inmunizacià ³n de los Centros de Control y Prevencià ³n de Enfermedades estime conveniente.Reportes sobre posibles discapacidades de aprendizaje o enfermedades mentales.Informe hecho por un mà ©dico que certifique, si el paciente tuvo tuberculosis, el progreso, tratamiento y duracià ³n de la enfermedad.Informe hecho por un mà ©dico que certifique, si el paciente tuvo sà ­filis, que la persona recibià ³ el tratamiento adecuado.Radiografà ­as del tà ³rax, si se tienen. Reportes mà ©dicos de historia clà ­nica de enfermedad mental (aplican los intentos de suicidio, violencia contra sà ­ mismo, otros, o animales) en los que se determine si estos fueron causados por problemas mà ©dicos, psiquià ¡tricos o generados por droga o alcohol.Reportes mà ©dicos de historia clà ­nica en caso de haber sido hospitalizado por drogas o alcohol (diagnà ³stico, tratamiento y duracià ³n).Reportes mà ©dicos si se està ¡ bajo alguna medicacià ³n de manera continua y las razones de la misma. El formulario I-693 para quienes està ©n en Estados Unidos. Estas son las enfermedades que podrà ­an excluir a una persona de la residencia: Sà ­filis, en estado contagiosoGonorreaTuberculosis tipo ALepraEnfermedades mentales acompaà ±adas de comportamientos considerados perjudiciales o daà ±inos Desde el 2010 el test de VIH ya no es parte de los requisitos para obtener la green card.  ¿Quà © pasa con condiciones preexistentes no contagiosas pero graves? En algunos casos la enfermedad que padece una persona puede convertirla en una carga al estado una vez esta se convierta en un residente permanente legal. Un ejemplo es una persona quien no puede trabajar por enfermedad o tiene un padecimiento que requiere de medicinas costosas por el resto de su vida. Dicha enfermedad puede ser fà ­sica o mental. En casos muy extraordinarios es posible que se pida al  patrocinador  econà ³mico, quien firma el affidavit of support o de sostenimiento, que muestre recursos financieros mà ¡s altos de los requeridos habitualmente para hacer frente a ese problema, o que el solicitante acredite tener un seguro mà ©dico que cubra dicha enfermedad. Si no aprueban la residencia por motivos mà ©dicos el primer paso es consultar a un abogado para solicitar un waiver. Este artà ­culo es informativo y no pretende ser asesorà ­a legal.